RIGHTEOUS-RIGHT

Help one another in righteousness and pity; but do not help one another in sin and rancor (Q.5:2). The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. (Edmond Burke). Oh! What a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive! (Walter Scott, Marmion VI). If you are not part of the solution …. Then you are part of the problem. War leaves no victors, only victims. … Mankind must remember that peace is not God's gift to his creatures; it is our gift to each other.– Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech, 1986.

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

THOMAS JEFFERSON AND THE QUR’AN

Edited: Israr Hasan                                                                                                           July 4, 2015
ihasanfaq@yahoo.com

When I was checking my emails a couple of weeks ago, I found a mail from one of my friends telling me about ‘Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an’. It struck my deep fascination and attention when I read some paragraphs about it. I had a strong feeling since years long as to how and why the Constitution of the United States has so much in align with the Qur’anic precepts of justice and human freedom. When I read details of my friend’s email about Jefferson’s Qur’an it immediately responded to my long-searching quest. And it resulted in the following writeup.

I ordered the book, referenced in my friend’s email, from Broward Public Library, titled “Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an: Islam and the Founders”, written by Denise A. Spellberg and published by Alfred A. Knoff New York, 2013; got the book in few days, read it and learnt the multi-dimensional political, religious and social currents going in the 18th century United States and Europe.  What was the most peculiar and singular in the life and work of the founding fathers, as depicted in the book, was unique in the Christian world then. The first founding fathers like George Washington, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were determined to go against the European hate-tradition in respect of Islam and Muslim and fought for individual freedom for all citizens of the United States without any discrimination of color, race, and religion.

The subject of relationship of Muslims and Islam in the United States from the 18th century till today in the 21st has a wide spectrum and hundreds of books have been written on the subject. My purpose of this writing is just to investigate how and why the founding fathers of the United States went against the then religious-political norms in the 18th century Christian Europe and the United States.

Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) was the principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776) of the United States and the nation’s first secretary of state (1789-94), second vice president (1797-1801), and third president (1801-09). Jefferson was an early advocate of the total separation of church and state (Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom), and the most eloquent American proponent of individual freedom as the core meaning of the American Revolution.

In a religious biography of Thomas Jefferson, Edwin Gaustad, one of his biographers, writes: “Jefferson would gather ideas as a reaper gather corn, selecting and retaining the most delectable, ignoring or discarding the unsuitable to his taste. He sought ideas from all sorts of philosophers from all different times. Jefferson seemed to have a special ability to decipher right from wrong and useful from useless.” He showed that in so many different spheres of life. Jefferson liked books as they gave him new and good ideas. He was a great collector of books.[1]  

Thomas Jefferson had a vast personal library. Among his collections was a two-volume Qur’an in English translation by George Sale. He ordered this Quran in 1765, eleven years before he wrote the Declaration of Independence. He was a law student then, and he had the book shipped from England to Williamsburg, Virginia. George Sale (c.1696-1736) a lawyer and an Anglican, described the Prophet Muhammad on the first page of his translation as “the legislator of the Arabs,” words that would have appealed to Jefferson as lawyer. When he bought the QUR’AN in 1765, Jefferson was engaged in criticizing the recently passed British Stamp Act. The immediate reason to study the QUR’AN seemed to gain an insight into Islamic law and religion. The added reason to know the QUR’AN and Islam would have been seeking legal precedents for local Virginia cases for which he was often looking to other cultures around the world.[2]

According a State Department document, Jefferson’s knowledge about Islam “likely came from his legal studies of natural law.” The State Department document continued: “In 1765, Jefferson purchased a two-volume English translation of the Qur’an for his personal library, a collection that became, in 1815, the basis of the modern Library of Congress.”[3]

Jefferson’s Qur’an survives still in the Library of Congress, serving as a symbol of his and early America’s complex relationship with Islam and its adherents. That relationship remains of signal importance to this day.

The only fear at the time for the United States and Europe, depicted by Islam, was the antithesis of the true faith of Protestant Christianity, as well as the source of tyrannical governments of Ottoman Turks. To tolerate Muslims—to accept them as a part of a Protestant Christian society—was to welcome people who professed a faith most 18th century Europeans and Americans believed false, foreign, and threatening. Catholics would be similarly characterized in American Protestant founding discourses. Indeed their faith, like Islam, would be deemed a source of tyranny and thus antithetical to American ideas of liberty.[4]

Jefferson was unique in many ways. He criticized Islam as he criticized Catholic Christianity and Judaism. He talked about Islam as a religion that repressed scientific inquiry. A strange idea he got from Voltaire that made him able to separate his principles about Muslim religious liberty and civil rights from the inherited European prejudices about Islam.
The Founders of this nation explicitly included Islam in their vision of the future of the republic. Freedom of religion, as they conceived it, encompassed it. Adherents of the faith were, with some exceptions, regarded as men and women who would make law-abiding, productive citizens. Far from fearing Islam, the Founders would have incorporated it into the fabric of American life.”

What the supporters of Muslim rights were proposing was extraordinary in the 18th century. America citizenship—which had embraced only free, white, male Protestants—was in effect to be abstracted from religion.  Race and gender would continue as barriers, but not so faith. “In fact, Jefferson, Washington and James Madison worked toward this ideal of separation of religion from state affairs throughout their entire political lives. Jefferson and others despite their negative, often incorrect understanding of Islam, pursued that ideal by advocating the rights of Muslims and all non-Protestants.”[6]

Thomas Jefferson would be the first in the history of American politics to suffer the false charge of being a Muslim, an accusation considered the ultimate Protestant slur in the 18th century. That a presidential candidate in the twenty-first century should have been subject to much the same false attack as the one in the 18th century demonstrates the importance of examining how the multiple images of Islam and Muslims first entered American consciousness and how the rights of Muslims first came to be accepted as national ideals. Ultimately, the status of Muslim citizenship in America today cannot be properly appreciated without establishing the historical context of its 18th century origins.

Jefferson’s Qur’an grabbed the national spotlight in January 2007 when Keith Ellison, the country’s first Muslim congressman, chose to swear his private oath of office on the Jefferson’s Qur’an.

Jefferson declares in the Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom, drafted in 1777; proposed in Virginia in 1779 and made state law in 1786:[7]
     “That our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions….     That therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy of the public      confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust    and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that         religious opinion,       is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and   advantages to which, in          common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right.”

Between 1776 and 1779 Jefferson drafted over one hundred pieces of legislation for the state of Virginia, but until his dying day he would remain most proud of “A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom”, which would be called “the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom.”[8]

The time was not the 2000s but the 1790s, and the presidential candidate was Thomas Jefferson, who was, in Denise Spellberg’s words, “the first in the history of American politics to suffer the false charge of being a Muslim, an accusation considered the ultimate Protestant slur in the eighteenth century.”[9]

Jefferson had a skeptical outlook to every religious scripture.  The Quran was no different than the Hebrew Bible or the New Testament. But he placed his Quran he bought in a selected place in his library, called “a blueprint of his own mind.”[10]

Jefferson had urged his nephew to make a logical examination of all assumed truths in religion: “Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion.” Jefferson believed that each scripture frequently failed his rationalist test. Of the Old Testament, he wrote: “Those facts in the Bible which contradict the laws of nature must be examined with more care, and under a variety of faces. Here you must recur to the pretensions of the writer to inspiration from God. Examine upon what evidence his pretensions are founded.”[11]

Respecting the New Testament, Jefferson urged his nephew to consider “the opposite pretensions” of key Christian doctrines regarding Jesus’s divinity, virgin birth, and whether he “ascended bodily into heaven.” He also advised the lad not to fear if his analysis “ends in a belief that there is no God.” …. Your own reason is the only oracle given you by heaven, and you are answerable, not for the rightness, but uprightness of the decision.”[12]

His perceptions of Islam in his political life remain, at the very least, ambiguous, even enigmatic.  Only in the later evolution of his private religious beliefs does Jefferson’s diplomatic appreciation for Islam’s central tenet seem sincere. He privately affirmed a much more pointed approval of the faith in Islam in one letter to Tripoli and in four to Tunis in 1806 wherein he assured his “great and good friend” of the mutuality of their beliefs in a single supreme being.[13]
 ‘It was impossible’, Jefferson wrote to John Adams, ‘for the human mind not to perceive and feel a conviction of design, consummate skill, and indefinite power in every atom of its composition.’[14]

In 1815 Jefferson sold his treasured 6700-volume library, then the country’s largest private collection, to the US government for $23,950.  Jefferson had doubled the size of his holdings by frequenting London and Paris booksellers, where he purchased most of his volumes on the Middle East.  Among his boos, which would become the nucleus of America’s national library (what is now the Library of Congress), was his copy of the Qur’an.[15]

Whatever his ambivalence about Islam, Jefferson’s position on Muslim rights and potential for citizenship remained consistent from his days as a law student in the 1760s until the end of his life. In fact, in his thinking about American citizenship, Jefferson subscribed an even more expansive and at the time, unusual idea, borrowed from John Locke in 1776: “neither Pagan nor Mahamedan nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the Commonwealth because of his religion.”[16]

While looking back upon his efforts to advance his Virginia Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom in 1786, he would proudly recall his lifelong intent “to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.”[17] These words affirm Jefferson’s belief in the free exercise of religion in America, and the principle of American civic inclusion irrespective of faith and religion.

A year before his death, Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend’s son.  Jefferson advised, “Love your neighbor as yourself, and your country more than yourself.”[18] His final reference to the Golden Rule is as clear a sign as we have its importance and universal application in his personal ethics as well as its centrality to his concept of patriotism. The same inclusive precedents for the practice of the Golden Rule existed in the Hebrew Bible (Lev.19:18), New Testament (Matt. 22:39), and the Qur’an (2:256; 10:19).
                                                   

[1] Denise A. Spellberg’s “Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an”, pub. Alfred  A. Knoff, New York, 2013.
[2] Ibid. p.83.
[3] www.iipdigital.usembassy.gov.
[4] Thomas S. Kidd:  “God of Liberty: A Religious History of the American Revolution”; New York Basic Books, 2010; pp.16-20.
[5] James H. Hutson, chief of the Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, his book: "Religion and the Founding of the American Republic," 1998.
[6] Denise A. Spellberg; Thomas Jefferson’s Quran; p.7.
[7] Denise A. Spellberg; Thomas Jefferson’s Quran; p/x.
[8] http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mssmtj.mtjbibo24905; Thomas Jefferson Paper Series 1651-1827, Library of Congress image 1135.
[9] Ibid. Denise A. Spellberg;
[10]  Thomas Jefferson’s Library: A Catalog with the Entries in His Own Order (Washington, DC: Library of Congress 1989).
[11] “Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr”  Aug.10, 1787 in Life and Selected Writings, p.399.
[12]  Ibid. Denise A. Spellberg;  p.400.
[13] Ibid. p.237.
[14] Ibid.
[15] Ibid. Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an; Denise A. Spellberg; p.233.
[16]  Ibid. p.238.
[17] “Jefferson’s Autobiography” in “Life and Selected Writings”, p.46.
[18] Ibid. Denise A. Spellberg; p.301.                                                                                               

No comments:

Post a Comment