Discipline is the suppression of base desires, and
is usually understood to be synonymous with restraint
and control. Self-discipline is to some extent a
substitute for motivation. Discipline is
when one uses reason to determine the best course of action regardless of one's
own desires, which may be the opposite of one’s self-discipline. Virtuous behavior can be described as when one's values are
aligned with one's aims: to do what one knows is best and to do it gladly.
In self-discipline one makes a
“disciple” of oneself. One is one’s own
teacher, trainer, coach, and disciplinarian.
It is all odd sort of relationship, paradoxical in its own way, and many
of us don’t handle it very well. There
is much unhappiness and personal distress in the world because of failures to
control tempers, appetites, passions, and impulses.
Positive Discipline is a discipline
model used in schools, and in parenting, that focuses on the positive points of behavior, based
on the ideal that there are no bad children, just good and bad behaviors. We can teach and reinforce the good behaviors while
suppressing the bad ones without hurting
the child verbally or physically. People engaging in positive discipline are not ignoring
problems. Rather, they are actively involved in helping their child learn how
to handle situations more appropriately while remaining calm, friendly and
respectful to the children themselves. Positive discipline includes a number of
different techniques that, used in combination, can lead to a more effective
way for parents to manage their kids’ behavior, or for teachers to manage their
students. Things become dubious for a child when his parents in home and
teachers in school act in contravention of positive discipline.
The question has been at or near the
center of Western philosophy since its very beginnings. Plato divided the soul into three parts or
operations—reason, passion, and appetite—and said that right behavior results
from harmony or control of these elements.
Saint Augustine sought to understand the soul by ranking its various
forms of love in his famous ordo amoris: love of God, neighbor,
self, and material goods. Sigmund Freud
divided the psyche into the id., ego, and superego. And we find William Shakespeare examining the
conflicts of the soul, the struggle between good and evil called the
psychomachia, in immortal works such as King Lear, Macbeth, Othello, and
Hamlet. Again and again, the problem is
one of the soul’s proper balance and order without which an individual’s
self-discipline cannot achieve positive enhancement.
But the question of correct order of the soul
is not simply the domain of sublime philosophy and drama. It lies at the heart of the task of
successful everyday behavior, whether it is controlling our tempers, or our appetites
or our inclinations to sit all day in front of the television. Our habits make all the difference. We learn to order our souls the same way we
learn to do math problems or play baseball well—through practice.
Practice, of course, is the medicine
hard to swallow. If it were easy, we
wouldn’t have such modern-day phenomena as multimillion-dollar diet and
exercise industries. We can enlist the
aid of trainers, therapists, support groups, step programs, and other
strategies, but in the end, its practice that makes self-control possible.
Considerable
disagreement exists over what should legitimately be studied in formal
institutions of learning for self-discipline. Usually, some topics or subjects are considered taboo. These taboos may come about
through interpretations of the law, as in the case of the exclusion of
religious teaching from public schools in the United States. Or they may come
about as a result of pressure from interest groups, as in the attempts to
exclude sex education, teaching about Communism, and sensitivity training from
American schools. The major considerations are that young children are not well
equipped to resist heavy bias in teaching and that they are usually compelled
by law to attend school and thus constitute a captive audience. It is sometimes
argued, therefore, that they should be protected against religious and
political propaganda and against material or experiences that require greater
maturity to be handled creatively. On the other side, the danger in such
arguments is that they can be used to keep all controversy out of schools and
to render them places characterized by dull uniformity of thought.
There is
nothing distinctively religious in recognizing that religious faith adds a
significant dimension to self-discipline. No doubt that Faith is a source of
discipline and power and meaning in the lives of the faithful of any major
religious creed. It is a potent force in human experience.
A shared
faith binds people together in ways that cannot be duplicated by other
means. Clashing faiths, on the other
hand, divide people in sometimes the most violent ways. A secular world
stripped of all vestige of religion would assuredly have no religious wars, but
it follows, by no means, that it would be a world at peace. We do faith a disservice in laying at its
doorstep the fundamental causes of faction.
Faith
contributes to the form and the content of the ideals that guide the aspirations
for our self-discipline in our lives, and it affects the way we regard and
behave with respect to others. “The fruit of the Spirit”—love, joy, peace,
patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control
(Galatians 5:22-23)—has its parallels in all the major faiths; and the Golden
Rule, expressed in one form or another, is recognized almost universally. Faith
can contribute important elements to the social stability and moral development
towards self-discipline of individuals and groups.
There can be
no disagreement in the fact that the major sources of self-discipline for a
child are home and schooling. From birth to adolescence a child learns from
imitating the behavior of his/her elders in home. Also there can be no disagreement in the fact
that elders at home and school are not always equipped with positive
self-discipline, a situation which affects adversely on a child behavior.
- O -
No comments:
Post a Comment